Robert Beadles’ Tracker Scandal: Who Paid for Schieve's Lawyers?

The unanswered questions are who paid for Hillary Schieve’s legal battle, and what are the underlying allegations against Schieve that started all of this?

Michael Leonard

Nov 05, 2025

The revelation that conservative activist and Washoe County GOP influencer Robert Beadles was the mysterious “John Doe” behind the GPS tracker placed on Mayor Hillary Schieve’s vehicle came as no surprise — and few following Reno politics were taken aback.

Within minutes of 775 News, KTVN, KOLO, and The Nevada Independent reporting the story, social media threads across local news pages erupted. The responses, drawn from hundreds of public comments, reveal a city that’s at once scandal-numb and morally polarized — a community that’s learned to expect intrigue at every turn of local politics.

“No One Is Surprised” — The Predictable Shockwave

Across the comment sections of KTVN 2 News, 775 Times, and RGJ, the reaction followed a familiar pattern: eye-rolling disbelief rather than shock. The sense that Beadles was the likely culprit had already hardened in Reno’s online political circles months ago. The official unmasking only confirmed what many suspected — that the secrecy had done more damage than disclosure ever could. For many residents, the headline made explicit what had long been a rumor.

🚨 The Hidden Story in TrackerGate: Allegations of Corruption

Legality vs. Ethics: A Divided Public

The comments exposed a deep divide between those who view Beadles’ actions as stalking and those who see them as oversight.

On one side were privacy advocates who argued that attaching a tracker to anyone’s vehicle — especially that of an elected official — is invasive and potentially dangerous.

“Public officials are still human beings with rights,” one commenter wrote. “This wasn’t accountability; it was intimidation.”

On the other side were “nothing to hide” voices — citizens who dismiss privacy concerns as naïve in an age of cell-phone tracking and social media surveillance.

“If you’re in government, expect to be watched,” one wrote. “They track us all the time.”

That tension — between transparency and harassment — has become a defining moral line in Reno’s political culture. The comment threads make clear that people can not agree on where legitimate scrutiny ends and weaponized surveillance begins.

The Rise of Riley Sutton, and Changing Dynamics, Reno’s Most Connected Political Consultant

The Cost and Council Member Reese’s Response

Councilman Devon Reese, who is both a lawyer and a longtime confidant of Mayor Schieve, seized on the situation. In a Facebook thread responding to the RGJ article, Reese estimated that Beadles’ legal fight to conceal his identity had likely cost around $1 million and described the ordeal as “a million-dollar lark.”

“The extremes he went to try and hide were probably a $1M lark,” Reese wrote. “The spin from his websites and others in his universe shows the extent to which they will go to influence people — that is scary.” Reese often talks about being scared.

That casual remark — offered in a Facebook comment — opens up a new and unexamined dimension of this story: What has the lawsuit cost the Schieve side?

The Unanswered Question: Who Paid Schieve’s Legal Fees?

If Beadles really has burned through $1 million in legal expenses, as Reese estimates, the natural question follows:

How much has Mayor Schieve spent — and where did that money come from?

There is no public accounting of the Mayor’s legal funding. Her lawsuit against Beadles and private investigator David McNeely is a personal matter, not a city-filed case, meaning public funds do not automatically cover it. Still, no one has clarified whether she paid privately, used an insurance mechanism, or received assistance from third-party donors or organizations.

For a public official whose brand should be tied to transparency, the funding source for such a politically charged lawsuit deserves scrutiny.

Was it out-of-pocket? Through a legal defense fund? Or subsidized by political allies or consultants?

So far, none of the local outlets that broke the Beadles revelation have addressed that question — but it’s one that voters, taxpayers, and ethics watchdogs all have a right to ask.

🧴 Mayor Schieve and Doctor Hovenic: Spooge, and Scrutiny

The Inner Circle and the PR Machine

The financial opacity becomes more intriguing when you consider who is shaping the messaging. Reese is not just an elected official and attorney; he’s also part of the same political network that manages public perception around Schieve.

He reportedly spends tens of thousands of dollars on public relations consultant Riley Sutton, who helps polish the images of political figures across Reno, including Hillary Schieve. When that same circle handles both messaging and political crisis control, we wonder what lines have been crossed.

In this context, Reese’s $1M remark reads less like gossip and more like message discipline — an effort to frame the scandal’s cost and moral weight while reinforcing the Schieve-Reese alliance. Reese is running for Mayor and has been endorsed by Schieve. But by calling out the spending by Beadles he puts the light on Schieve.

Inside Hillary Schieve’s $417,000, 2022 Campaign Machine for Mayor of Reno

A City Exhausted by Intrigue

Beyond the partisan sniping, a more profound fatigue began to surface. Dozens of comments questioned why Reno politics seem to produce endless scandals, while fundamental issues such as infrastructure, housing, and debt remain unaddressed.

“There’s something wrong when a small city like Reno is constantly embroiled in political intrigue,” one user wrote. “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.”

The threads that lit up over the Beadles story also contained complaints about sewer rate hikes, construction sites, and data centers — reminders that residents are weary of drama and hungry for leadership.

At the same time, the revelation highlights how political elites on both sides are spending staggering sums to fight battles that most residents never asked for — a microcosm of how power and money continue to dominate Reno’s civic life.

Previous
Previous

A Stadium for a Billionaire: How Reno Subsidized Greater Nevada Field

Next
Next

Jacobs Entertainment Promised ‘No Excessive Noise’ — and Delivered a Valley-Wide Rave