What WCSD’s Ledger Reveals About Governance, and Litigation
This article examines the school district’s payments to its general counsel, McDonald Carano Wilson LLP, the same firm embroiled in the Judge Robb scandal and we find payments that raise questions.
Feb 19, 2026
Over the past several years, the Washoe County School District (WCSD) has faced a steady stream of controversy: ethics violations involving trustees, lawsuits alleging serious harm to students, internal governance conflict, and the abrupt resignation of a superintendent hired through a national search.
What has been largely missing from public discussion is a precise, document-based examination of how the district’s legal spending evolved during this period—and whether the public has been given sufficient information to understand how legal representation, conflicts, and procurement were handled.
Using WCSD’s “Checks by Vendor” public records, this article examines the district’s payments to its longtime general counsel, McDonald Carano Wilson LLP. It places those payments alongside the timeline of ethics actions, lawsuits, and leadership turmoil. What emerges is not an allegation of wrongdoing but questions regarding transparency, disclosure, and governance that warrant public answers.
The Judge, the Senior Partner, the Junior Lawyer and the Scandal
·
Jan 30
This article examines the scandal involving Judge Robb and Senior Partner Addison of McDonald Carano, as well as the subsequent investigation into the cases.
The Source Material: WCSD’s Accounting Records
All dollar figures cited here come directly from WCSD’s publicly accessible “Checks by Vendor” reports, filtered by fiscal year and vendor name “McDonald Carano.” These are district-generated accounting records, not estimates.
Two fiscal years matter most:
FY2023 (July 2022 – June 2023)
FY2025 (July 2024 – June 2025)
Together, they bracket the most contentious period in recent WCSD history. In total, McDonald Carano got $443,687.50 from 2023 to 2026.
A ledger entry from the WCSD Checks by Vendor ledger showing payments to McDonald Carano totaling $68,850.94.
Phase One: July 2022 — A Sudden Surge in Legal Spending
The first central inflection point appears immediately after WCSD hired Superintendent Dr. Susan Enfield, who began her role in July 2022.
FY2023 Snapshot
Date: July 22, 2022
Vendor: McDonald Carano Wilson LLP
Account: General Counsel
Checks Issued: 9
Amount: $68,850.94
This was not a gradual increase. It was a single-month spike — the largest payment to McDonald Carano in that fiscal year.
What makes the timing notable is not the payment itself, but what else was happening:
Superintendent Susan Enfield had just begun her tenure.
Trustee Joe Rodriguez would soon become the subject of ethics proceedings.
Over the remainder of FY2023, WCSD continued paying McDonald Carano for “Outside counsel for the District,” including another large payment at the end of the fiscal year:
June 30, 2023: $31,711.94
By the close of FY2023, WCSD had paid McDonald Carano well over $100,000.
The Rodriguez Ethics Case: Context Matters
In August 2023, the Nevada Commission on Ethics found WCSD Trustee Joe Rodriguez in violation of state ethics laws and fined him $1,000. The case stemmed from Rodriguez’s use of images showing himself in his State Fire Marshal uniform in campaign materials. Rodriguez disputed the findings and initiated litigation challenging the Ethics Commission’s actions, including claims under the Open Meeting Law. That litigation extended well into 2024.
Why this matters here is to note that during this period:
Rodriguez was a sitting WCSD trustee.
He was personally involved in an active ethics dispute.
WCSD’s general counsel was being paid at elevated levels.
Whether McDonald Carano represented Rodriguez personally — and if so, on what terms — is not publicly documented. That unanswered question becomes more critical when institutional and individual legal interests overlap.
School Trustee Rodriguez found guilty of ethics violations, fined $1,000
Link to This is Reno article
Lawsuits Against WCSD Begin to Mount
In March 2023, two civil lawsuits were filed against WCSD, its Board of Trustees, and Superintendent Enfield. The complaints alleged serious failures involving disabled students, including neglect, discrimination, and abuse.
Regardless of the eventual outcome of those cases, they marked a clear escalation in the district’s legal exposure.
Link, EXCLUSIVE: Two Lawsuits Filed Against Washoe County School District
Phase Two: July 2024 — An Even Larger Spike
The second, and more dramatic, inflection point occurs two years later.
FY2025 Snapshot
Date: July 19, 2024
Vendor: McDonald Carano Wilson LLP
Account: General Counsel
Checks Issued: 15
Amount: $123,421.70
In some prior years, this single billing period exceeded the annual total. Unlike earlier entries, FY2025 records include case-specific descriptions — and this is where the accounting records become especially revealing.
A ledger entry from the WCSD Checks by Vendor ledger showing payments to McDonald Carano totalling $123,421.70.
“Church vs. WCSD”: Litigation Appears by Name
WCSD’s FY2025 vendor report includes line items explicitly labeled:
“Church vs. WCSD”
January 31, 2025 – $25,150.00
May 9, 2025 – $11,350.00
Other entries throughout FY2025 are described as “Outside attorney fees” or “Outside counsel for the District,” with payments continuing steadily through June 2025. This confirms that McDonald Carano was not simply retained as a general counsel. The firm was actively billing WCSD for specific litigation.
WCSD ordered to pay ex-Trustee Jeff Church $40K in legal fees from public records suit
Link to RGJ article.
The $500,000 Legal Defense Vote
In early 2024, WCSD trustees voted to allocate $500,000 for outside legal defense related to ongoing litigation. That vote was publicly justified by WCSD as necessary due to the volume and complexity of legal actions involving the district. The FY2025 McDonald Carano billing aligns squarely with that posture: sustained, litigation-driven legal work rather than sporadic advisory services.
Link to Nevada Globe article
Superintendent Enfield’s Resignation
In November 2023, Superintendent Susan Enfield announced her resignation, with her final day set for February 9, 2024—less than two years after her appointment. Superintendent contracts commonly include provisions for district-paid legal representation related to employment matters.
Whether McDonald Carano provided such representation to Enfield — and how that work was billed — is not disclosed in public summaries of WCSD’s legal spending. Again, the issue is not whether representation occurred, but whether the public has enough information to understand how it was handled.
WCSD Superintendent Dr. Susan Enfield to Resign, Last Day February 9
Link to 2 News article
What the Records Show — and What They Do Not
What the records clearly show:
Two sharp spikes in payments to McDonald Carano: July 2022 and July 2024.
Sustained billing during periods of intense legal conflict.
Explicit billing for named litigation, including “Church vs. WCSD.”
What the records do not show:
The scope of McDonald Carano’s engagement letter(s).
Whether services were competitively bid or expanded without rebidding.
Whether the firm represented individual trustees or administrators personally.
If so, who paid, and whether any such work was disclosed or reported as in-kind.
Why This Is a Governance Story
Nothing in these records proves misconduct, but public institutions are not judged solely by legality; they are considered by transparency.
When a single law firm serves simultaneously as:
General counsel to a public district,
Litigation counsel during active lawsuits,
And potentially counsel to individual officials facing ethics or employment issues,
The public is entitled to clear disclosures, documented safeguards, and straightforward answers.
The Questions That Remain
Procurement: When and how did WCSD expand McDonald Carano’s role from general counsel to litigation-heavy outside counsel? Was that expansion rebid or formally approved?
Individual Representation: Did McDonald Carano represent Joe Rodriguez or Susan Enfield personally? If so, who paid, and how was it disclosed?
Conflict Management: What conflict-screening measures were in place when district leadership and the district itself faced overlapping legal exposure?
Final Thought
This article is not about assigning blame. It concerns following the receipts, reviewing the ledger, and assessing whether WCSD’s governance practices meet the transparency standard that taxpayers should expect. The documents raise questions. The answers should be public.
Support independent journalism in Reno. Click to donate to: Mike’s Reno Report.